Responsible role
Loading workflow gate
Requirements and master model: confirm engineering documents and responsible people.
Start at the first gate. Every action creates a record.
Action records are saved in the central admin area.
Die engineering and inspection / Process validation
Die engineering and inspection feedback
Propagate model changes through NC, supplier drawings and inspection datums, then back into engineering decisions.
View 3D Operation
Process demonstration workspace · Sources and manufacturer confirmation
Engineering status / Order delivery
Can this order be released now?
- Requirements and master model
- Material / forming review
- CAM / NC and drawings
- Supplier receipt confirmation
- Assembly and tryout
- Scanning / datum alignment
- Deviation correction / retest / delivery
Action log and responsibility handoffs
Times are exercise parameters, not measured manufacturer savings. Export the full action path or review it in the central admin area.
Engineering workflow improvements
| Potential bottleneck | Improvement in this version | Problem addressed |
|---|---|---|
| Edit 3D then manually locate every drawing | One change record identifies the model, NC, inspection drawings and supplier drawing packs | Invalidate affected downstream data on revision, then regenerate and verify |
| Treat sending drawings as completion | Require the receiver to confirm part number, revision and use status | File delivery does not prove the new revision is in use |
| Release as soon as a scan report exists | First confirm measurement datums, units, revision and deviation limits | Retain retest evidence and human quality approval after correction |
These are the Demo workflow proposals, not findings of defects in the manufacturer system. The manufacturer may retain, revise or reject each proposal.
Complete process handoffs
- 01Requirements and master model
- 02Material / forming review
- 03CAM / NC and drawings
- 04Supplier receipt confirmation
- 05Assembly and tryout
- 06Scanning / datum alignment
- 07Deviation correction / retest / delivery
Every gate must identify the revision, owner, required input, retained evidence and conditions that block the next step.
Manufacturer review and scope of 1:1 scope
Case references and public evidence
UMIX Co., Ltd. · Hirakata, Osaka, Japan · Verifiable public reference
- MOBIO company listing gives the address Kasugakitamachi, Hirakata, Osaka: 2-37-1, and automotive press-die design and manufacturing activities.
- Japan Finance Corporation 2019 interview records 3D CAD, forming simulation and 3D scanning, with emphasis on verification at each stage and shared design/manufacturing skills.
- These are historical references. Current equipment lists, floorplans and proprietary CAD have not been obtained, so current specifications and cycle times cannot be verified.
MOBIO · UMIX Company profile — Public industrial-support source; checked on 2026-09-29.
Japan Finance Corporation · 2019 interview — Printed report pages 10–13; historical process reference, not the current internal SOP.
UMIX Recovery V1 — User-provided original site; access was limited during this review.
Three inputs to replace with real factory data next
- Manufacturer-supplied 3D / 2D comparison parts and nonconfidential NC samples
- Machine, tryout and scanning equipment lists and constraints
- Drawing-pack recipients, revision withdrawal, measurement datums and acceptance criteria
This version follows the supplied case conditions and public processes. Manufacturer data is required to verify dimensions, layout, interlocks, formal permissions and cycle times at 1:1 validation. Actual machinery must be operated under manufacturer procedures.